Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼ö Á¾ÀÇ Áö°¢ °ú¹Î ¿ÏÈ­Á¦°¡ ÀÎ»ê ¾Æ¿¬ ½Ã¸àÆ® »ç¿ë½Ã ÁÖÁ¶°üÀÇ À¯Áö·Â ¹× ÀûÇÕµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The effect of various desensitizing agents on retention and fitness of cemented crowns with zinc phosphate cement

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1994³â 32±Ç 2È£ p.181 ~ 194
¿À¼¼¿í, ÀÌÈ£¿ë,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¿À¼¼¿í ( Oh Se-Wook ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÈ£¿ë ( Lee Ho-Yong ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to compare the retention and fitness of crown treated with various desensitizing agents on natural teeth. Varnish, dentin primer, bonding agent and potassium oxalate treated groups and control group with no treatment were used. The retention test was executed with the Instron test machine(Instron Co., U.S.A.) on 24 hours after cementation with zinc phosphate cement. After retention test, the teeth and crowns were washed and recemented. The cemented crowns were embedded in clear resin and sectioned with a diamond saw. The occlusal and marginal fitnesses, were measured indirectly with a stereomicroscopic photographs. @ES The results of this study were obtained as follows: @EN 1. The retention of control group was higher than any other desensitizing agent treated group. 2. The differences of retention among varnish, dentin primer, bonding agent and potassium oxalate treated groups were not statistically significant. 3. There were no statistically significant difference in fitness at occlusal surface and margin among control, varnish, dentin primer, bonding agent and potassium oxalate treated groups. According to these results, desensitizing agents used to protect the pulp from irritation of luting agents may adversely affect the retention of castings. Therefore, desensitizing agents should be used in limited areas carefully.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed